Nvidia Halves Its Backstop for OpenAI's Ohio Data Center
Nvidia is cutting its funding guarantee for OpenAI's 10-gigawatt Ohio data center from up to $250 billion to under $120 billion, the WSJ reports.

Illustration · AI-generated (AI IN LIFE)
At a glance
- Guarantee cut to under $120 billion per WSJ (up to $250 billion previously discussed)
- Nvidia initially backstops only half of the 10-GW project
- Reported trigger: investor concerns over Nvidia's risk exposure
- August 14 13F filing: ~$30 billion Intel, ~$21 billion SpaceX stakes
- Nvidia's investments notably flow to major customers of its chips
In late July, Nvidia confirmed talks over a guarantee of up to $250 billion for OpenAI's massive Ohio data center project. Now the chipmaker is pulling back: according to the Wall Street Journal, also cited by Reuters, the commitment has shrunk to under $120 billion.
Per the report, Nvidia will initially backstop only half of the 10-gigawatt project and decide on the remainder later. The driver, reportedly: investor concern about the sheer scale of risk sitting on Nvidia's balance sheet.
How deeply Nvidia now acts as financier of the AI ecosystem showed almost simultaneously in its 13F filing published August 14: among other stakes, it lists an Intel position worth about $30 billion and a SpaceX holding of roughly $21 billion.
The pattern is hard to miss: Nvidia's equity flows preferentially to companies that are also major buyers of its chips. Critics have warned for months about circular financing in the AI boom — the trimmed Ohio backstop will likely fuel that debate.
For OpenAI, the cut does not kill the project, but it does raise the pressure to line up additional backers for the build-out — in parallel with its own IPO plans.
FAQ
What is a backstop?
A funding guarantee: Nvidia would stand behind the data center project's obligations if other financing sources fall through.
Is the Ohio project at risk now?
Not immediately. But the cut increases pressure on OpenAI to secure additional backers for the project's second half.
Why is circular financing criticized?
When a chipmaker finances its own biggest customers, demand and valuations can look overstated — concentrating risk across the system.


